| 
                     
                      | Development 
                        of Ancient Egyptian Art |    Egyptian 
                    Art  The 
                    aesthetic qualities of ancient Egyptian art are greatly admired 
                    in our modern day and age, however the concept of art for 
                    art's sake was non-existent in ancient Egypt. Although the 
                    Egyptians did aim for great aesthetic levels in their art, 
                    they did not create masterpieces for the simple pleasure of 
                    admiring them. Egyptian art was, for all intent and purposes, 
                    a religious and funerary art that played a significant part 
                    in the cult of the gods and the dead. The magnificent art 
                    pieces displayed in museums across the world are now out of 
                    their original context and, understandably, it is sometimes 
                    difficult to understand their significance. Colourful paintings 
                    and reliefs, which once decorated the walls of tombs of Pharaoh 
                    and the royal family, wealthy officials, courtiers, and nobles, 
                    ensured the survival of the deceased in the afterlife. Sculptures 
                    could serve as a home for the " kâ " of the deceased (his 
                    spiritual essence) while others would be ex-voto and gifts 
                    offered to a deity. Some statues were even the manifestation 
                    of gods residing in a temple, where priests performed daily 
                    rituals and saw to the well being of the god.    
                     
                      | Hathor 
                          and Re-Horakhty from the tomb of Nefertari from the 
                          19th Dynasty found in Facsimile of Nefertari's tomb 
                          paintings in the Harrer Collection, San Bernardino, 
                          California |  
 
                     
                      |  Credits: Caroline Rocheleau
 |  Although 
                    the Egyptians expressed themselves and their culture in many 
                    artistic ways, the present text deals solely with the so-called 
                    "major arts" : sculpture, painting, and sculptured relief. 
                    Architecture, which is also one of the major arts, will not 
                    be discussed here since it is rather lengthy a topic. Painting 
                    and sculpture are two artistic expressions with which all 
                    are familiar, however, the principle of sculptured relief 
                    might be foreign to many. Sculptured reliefs, in very simple 
                    words, are basically drawings that have been carved on flat 
                    surfaces, stone walls and slabs being the prominent surfaces. 
                    Once the desired figure has been drawn on the wall, the artist 
                    can remove a thickness of the flat surface around the figure, 
                    giving the impression that the figure sticks out from the 
                    wall. Such type of relief is known as "raised relief." On 
                    the other hand, if the artist carves the contours of the figure 
                    and the figure itself really deep into the wall, the illusion 
                    of the figure being embedded in the wall is created. This 
                    is called "sunk relief." Sunlight dance and play with the 
                    carvings, thus creating shadows that give the reliefs a certain 
                    fullness and roundness impossible with pictures simply drawn 
                    on a wall. Such is the beauty of sculptured reliefs.
 
 
 
                     
                      | 	
                          Sunk Relief from a temple at Denderah 
                          from the Graeco-Roman Period found in Denderah  |  
 
                     
                      |  Credits: Egyptvoyager
 |  
 Development 
                    of Ancient Egyptian Art  Ancient 
                    Egyptian art, like any other artistic expression of a given 
                    period, reflected the social and cultural milieu from which 
                    it emerged. Additionally, the physical and geographical environment 
                    played a major role in the initial development of what may 
                    be define as typical Egyptian art.  A 
                    quick glance at a geographical map of Egypt reveals a country 
                    bordered by fantastic natural frontiers.    |     
 |       The 
                    northern border was the Mediterranean Sea, a formidable body 
                    of water, which only the most adventurous merchants would 
                    dare cross. The Sahara Desert (also called the Western Desert) 
                    separated Egypt from its western neighbour, Libya. Another 
                    desert, the Eastern Desert, which the Egyptians believed was 
                    filled with monsters, stretched between the Red Sea Coast 
                    and the Nile Valley, creating the eastern border. South, the 
                    Batn el-Haggar (the Belly of the Stones), a most desolate 
                    and arid region between the Third and Second Cataracts of 
                    the Nile River, in Nubia, was another excellent natural border. 
                    In addition to the Batn el-Haggar, the numerous cataracts 
                    on the river made sailing into Egypt from the south extremely 
                    perilous.
 Although 
                    arid deserts, dangerous seas, and cataracts surrounded the 
                    country, Egypt was nevertheless a very fertile and promising 
                    land. The regular and predictable floods of the Nile River 
                    left a thick black silt that fertilised the land, thus allowing 
                    peasants and pastoralists to settle in the valley and prosper. 
                    Moreover, within the boundaries of Egypt, the Nile is free 
                    of cataracts and thus navigable. Egypt was truly the 'gift 
                    of the Nile'. Such geographical isolation and luxurious environment 
                    resulted in a self-reliant and self-sufficient civilisation. 
                    The Egyptians were aware of the richness of their land and 
                    its life-giving river, and they were intimately attached to 
                    it. According to them, there was no place like home. Not surprisingly, 
                    the recurrent motif in Predynastic art, as seen on decorated 
                    ceramics, was a boat with many oars and a deck cabin. Additionally, 
                    hunting and pastoral scenes as well as vegetal motifs displayed 
                    the richness of the Egyptian fauna and flora.  However, 
                    this does not imply that the ancient Egyptians were totally 
                    devoid of foreign contact. On the contrary. Egypt maintained 
                    commercial contacts with its neighbours, Mesopotamia among 
                    others, and the influence of such contacts can be seen in 
                    art of the Predynastic period. A typical Mesopotamian motif 
                    borrowed by the Egyptians can been seen on wall paintings 
                    and on artefacts, such as the ivory handle of the so-called 
                    Gebel el-Arak knife (Louvre Museum, Paris): the man wrestling 
                    two beasts. Although the Egyptians borrowed a few artistic 
                    elements from their northeast neighbour, they had already 
                    begun to culturally and artistically define themselves and 
                    develop a style that could be identified as typically Egyptian. 
                    Indeed, the artistic conventions adopted during the later 
                    part of this early period were to regulate Egyptian art for 
                    the next 3000 years.  Following 
                    the unification of Upper and Lower Egypt, in spite of the 
                    regular commercial ventures abroad, foreign motifs were almost 
                    never used in the next three millennia of intense artistic 
                    activity. Instead, internal politics, periods of economic 
                    prosperity as well as social and religious values were to 
                    influence art. Expectedly, the art of the Old Kingdom reflects 
                    the economic prosperity of the country and the skill of the 
                    artists trained in royal workshops while the crude sculptures 
                    and paintings of the First Intermediate Period are the result 
                    of a country stricken by famine and civil war, where untrained 
                    artisans imitated to the best of their ability the art of 
                    the previous epoch.  Yet, 
                    the most incredible change of artistic values occurred during 
                    a very prosperous age (end of the Eighteenth Dynasty, New 
                    Kingdom), at the instigation of Pharaoh Akhenaton (Amenhotep 
                    IV), the heretic king. Akhenaton favoured the cult of the 
                    solar disk Aten above Amun, the national god, and all the 
                    other deities of the Egyptian pantheon. Serious changes in 
                    the artistic repertoire and Canon of human proportions thus 
                    resulted from Akhenaton's reign and this religious revolution. 
                    Egyptologists refer to this interlude as the Amarna period. 
                     King 
                    Tutankhamun, and the last pharaohs of the Eighteenth Dynasty, 
                    who ruled after him, reinstated the traditional artistic norms 
                    and former religious beliefs. Despite the Amarna interlude, 
                    New Kingdom art equalled and, according to many, surpassed 
                    in quality and beauty the masterpieces of the Old Kingdom. 
                     The 
                    Late Period, which is often considered a period of decline 
                    because of the decentralisation of imperial power, competing 
                    dynasties, and various invasions, nevertheless reveals that 
                    many of the rulers kept the ancient traditions alive, inspired 
                    by the glories of the past. As 
                  Alexander the Great conquered the Near East, a wave of Greek 
                  influence followed him. Egypt, which had initially inspired 
                  Greece (Hellas), was not immune to Greek (Hellene) influence. 
                  Hellenisation of Egyptian art was more or less subtle, yet present. 
                  Later Roman influence, however, was more than obvious. 
 (Caroline 
                  Rocheleau)
     |  |